Human impact has dramatically altered the biological distinctiveness of Southeastern Mixed Forests. About 99 percent of this habitat has been converted to agriculture and has become highly degraded due to European settlement (10). The effects of domestication were inescapable; it led to the clearing of land and allowed open range livestock (i.e. hogs, cattle) to feed on longleaf pine seedlings (2). The one process that took decades to become effective in the South was the passing of fence laws that required farmers to fence off their land in order to prevent livestock from running off and eating all the natural forage (2). However, this is not full proof and not all farmers abided to this law. The Southeastern Mixed Forests is "the most heavily settled ecoregion along the east coast of the U.S., and much of the land has been used for growing tobacco and peanuts" (10). After World War II many farm fields were left abandoned and there was a dramatic shift in land use from plantations to croplands (2). This shift made it easier for pines to out compete hardwoods for sun and nutrients and they better able to survive in the extreme environmental conditions of the abandoned fields (10). Due to repeated harvesting of pine stands in the mid-1960s, hardwoods began to dominate the understory of Southeastern Mixed Forests (10).
Conversion to agriculture is one of the main factors that led to deforestation of this ecosystem. For example, a remnant tall grass prairie known as the Black Belt was completely converted to agriculture (10). Because of the heavy rate of conversion, there is little left to conserve. The suppression of fire and the poor management of farmlands has "altered the plant communities and threatens the long-term persistence of many fire-dependent species" (10). Furthermore, high fragmentation has led to species loss, such as the black bear. In addition, large carnivores have been largely eliminated through deliberate efforts of humans (i.e. hunting, destruction of habitats). 400 years of land use for agriculture, livestock; logging; production of turpentine, and elimination of naturally-occurring wildfires have left less than 3% of the canopy's upper layer of natural vegetation (2).
Conversion to agriculture is one of the main factors that led to deforestation of this ecosystem. For example, a remnant tall grass prairie known as the Black Belt was completely converted to agriculture (10). Because of the heavy rate of conversion, there is little left to conserve. The suppression of fire and the poor management of farmlands has "altered the plant communities and threatens the long-term persistence of many fire-dependent species" (10). Furthermore, high fragmentation has led to species loss, such as the black bear. In addition, large carnivores have been largely eliminated through deliberate efforts of humans (i.e. hunting, destruction of habitats). 400 years of land use for agriculture, livestock; logging; production of turpentine, and elimination of naturally-occurring wildfires have left less than 3% of the canopy's upper layer of natural vegetation (2).
Gills
Creek- South Carolina
|
Black Belt Prairie |
McTier
Creek- South Carolina
|
Decreasing gymnosperms of southern mixed forests: (a) shortleaf pine, (b) longleaf pine, (c) swamp tupelo, and (d) pond cypress. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112713004088 |
Table 1. (3)
Species (trees ≥ 12.7 cm diameter) that increased or decreased in percent composition ≥ 5% for ≥ 2 million ha between oldest and newest USDA FIA surveys in the eastern United States. The first p-values, from paired t-tests, were for all ecological subsections, weighted by area, where the species was present with > 100 stems. The second p-values, also from paired t-tests for all ecological subsections, compared small trees (<12.7 cm in diameter) in old surveys to large trees in new surveys.
Table 2. (3)
Percent composition (trees ≥ 12.7 cm diameter) of eastern forests by pines, other gymnosperms, oaks, other angiosperms, and most frequent species for oldest (mean year = 1981) and newest (mean year = 2006) USDA FIA tree surveys, as well as the percent composition of groups for smaller trees (<12.7 cm diameter) in newest surveys. The first p-values, from paired t-tests, were for all ecological subsections, weighted by area, where the group contained ≥100 stems. See Table 1 for scientific names of increasing and decreasing species.
Species (trees ≥ 12.7 cm diameter) that increased or decreased in percent composition ≥ 5% for ≥ 2 million ha between oldest and newest USDA FIA surveys in the eastern United States. The first p-values, from paired t-tests, were for all ecological subsections, weighted by area, where the species was present with > 100 stems. The second p-values, also from paired t-tests for all ecological subsections, compared small trees (<12.7 cm in diameter) in old surveys to large trees in new surveys.
Species
|
Scientific name
|
Net change ha
|
Change % composition
|
Mean year old surveys
|
Mean year new surveys
|
p-value
|
p-value small trees
|
Loblolly pine
|
Pinus taeda
|
72704702
|
17.6
|
1974
|
2007
|
<.0001
|
<.0001
|
Red maple
|
Acer rubrum
|
29479009
|
7.4
|
1984
|
2006
|
<.0001
|
<.0001
|
Eastern redcedar
|
Juniperus virginiana
|
11049718
|
7.8
|
1982
|
2007
|
<.0001
|
0.1533
|
Slash pine
|
Pinus elliotti
|
10310840
|
11.8
|
1972
|
2006
|
0.064
|
0.0069
|
Green ash
|
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
|
7789190
|
8.7
|
1980
|
2007
|
0.2169
|
N/A
|
Boxelder
|
Acer negundo
|
5609990
|
11.4
|
1982
|
2007
|
0.0743
|
N/A
|
Red pine
|
Pinus resinosa
|
5128902
|
8.9
|
1983
|
2006
|
<.0001
|
N/A
|
Black spruce
|
Picea mariana
|
3128760
|
8.7
|
1980
|
2006
|
<.0001
|
0.0037
|
Northern white-cedar
|
Thuja occidentalis
|
2603295
|
10.1
|
1984
|
2006
|
0.0363
|
<.0001
|
Sugar maple
|
Acer saccharum
|
2132676
|
7.0
|
1987
|
2006
|
0.0011
|
0.1717
|
Tamarack
|
Larix laricina
|
2092218
|
10.3
|
1980
|
2006
|
0.0037
|
0.1632
|
Jack pine
|
Pinus banksiana
|
−2066916
|
−8.3
|
1979
|
2006
|
0.009
|
0.3393
|
Paper birch
|
Betula papyrifera
|
−2594284
|
−7.0
|
1982
|
2006
|
<.0001
|
0.1072
|
Eastern white pine
|
Pinus strobus
|
−3040918
|
−7.4
|
1986
|
2006
|
0.3578
|
0.3924
|
Virginia pine
|
Pinus virginiana
|
−5335089
|
−7.0
|
1979
|
2006
|
0.0004
|
0.4223
|
Pond pine
|
Pinus serotina
|
−5571550
|
−5.7
|
1972
|
2006
|
0.0005
|
N/A
|
Pond cypress
|
Taxodium ascendens
|
−5824112
|
−9.2
|
1970
|
2005
|
0.0015
|
N/A
|
American basswood
|
Tilia americana
|
−6116642
|
−7.0
|
1983
|
2006
|
0.0066
|
0.7936
|
Longleaf pine
|
Pinus palustris
|
−9881192
|
−8.0
|
1972
|
2007
|
<.0001
|
0.2804
|
Quaking aspen
|
Populus tremuloides
|
−12491657
|
−10.1
|
1979
|
2006
|
<.0001
|
<.0001
|
Black oak
|
Quercus velutina
|
−12661395
|
−8.3
|
1984
|
2007
|
<.0001
|
0.0002
|
Northern red oak
|
Quercus rubra
|
−14178855
|
−9.3
|
1984
|
2006
|
<.0001
|
0.0843
|
Swamp tupelo
|
Nyssa biflora
|
−14404729
|
−6.8
|
1972
|
2006
|
<.0001
|
0.0561
|
White oak
|
Quercus alba
|
−23820115
|
−7.6
|
1982
|
2006
|
<.0001
|
0.0325
|
Shortleaf pine
|
Pinus echinata
|
−38282915
|
−12.1
|
1975
|
2007
|
<.0001
|
0.1218
|
Table 2. (3)
Percent composition (trees ≥ 12.7 cm diameter) of eastern forests by pines, other gymnosperms, oaks, other angiosperms, and most frequent species for oldest (mean year = 1981) and newest (mean year = 2006) USDA FIA tree surveys, as well as the percent composition of groups for smaller trees (<12.7 cm diameter) in newest surveys. The first p-values, from paired t-tests, were for all ecological subsections, weighted by area, where the group contained ≥100 stems. See Table 1 for scientific names of increasing and decreasing species.
Forest type
|
Group
|
Old surveys
|
New surveys
|
p-value
| |||
%
|
Most frequent
|
%
|
Most frequent
|
% Small trees
| |||
Eastern broadleaf
|
Pines
|
7.4
|
Eastern white pine
|
8.0
|
Eastern white pine
|
4.3
|
0.0233
|
Eastern broadleaf
|
Other gymnosperms
|
3.1
|
Eastern hemlock, Tsuga canadensis
|
5.6
|
Eastern redcedar
|
5.5
|
<.0001
|
Eastern broadleaf
|
Oaks
|
38.2
|
White oak
|
26.6
|
White oak
|
9.5
|
<.0001
|
Eastern broadleaf
|
Other angiosperms
|
51.4
|
Red maple
|
59.8
|
Red maple
|
80.7
|
<.0001
|
Southeastern mixed
|
Pines
|
40.9
|
Loblolly pine
|
47.9
|
Loblolly pine
|
20.5
|
<.0001
|
Southeastern mixed
|
Other gymnosperms
|
3.6
|
Pond cypress
|
2.8
|
Pond cypress
|
2.3
|
0.0085
|
Southeastern mixed
|
Oaks
|
20.7
|
White oak
|
15.0
|
Water oak,Quercus nigra
|
16.1
|
<.0001
|
Southeastern mixed
|
Other angiosperms
|
34.8
|
Sweetgum, Liquidambar styraciflua
|
34.3
|
Sweetgum
|
61.1
|
0.0005
|
Northern mixed
|
Pines
|
7.7
|
Jack pine
|
8.9
|
Red pine
|
2.7
|
0.2194
|
Northern mixed
|
Other gymnosperms
|
25.9
|
Northern white-cedar
|
30.5
|
Northern white-cedar
|
37.2
|
<.0001
|
Northern mixed
|
Oaks
|
6.1
|
Northern red oak
|
4.8
|
Northern red oak
|
1.8
|
<.0001
|
Northern mixed
|
Other angiosperms
|
60.3
|
Quaking aspen
|
55.8
|
Red maple
|
58.3
|
<.0001
|
Prairies/savannas
|
Pines
|
1.9
|
Loblolly pine
|
3.0
|
Loblolly pine
|
2.3
|
0.0706
|
Prairies/savannas
|
Other gymnosperms
|
0.9
|
Eastern redcedar
|
4.4
|
Eastern redcedar
|
5.5
|
N/A
|
Prairies/savannas
|
Oaks
|
36.4
|
White oak
|
26.4
|
Post oak,Quercus stellata
|
13.8
|
<.0001
|
Prairies/savannas
|
Other angiosperms
|
60.8
|
American elm, Ulmus americana
|
66.2
|
American elm
|
78.5
|
<.0001
|
Prairies
|
Pines
|
4.0
|
Ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa
|
3.7
|
Ponderosa pine
|
2.0
|
N/A
|
Prairies
|
Other gymnosperms
|
3.2
|
Eastern redcedar
|
22.7
|
eastern redcedar
|
43.0
|
N/A
|
Prairies
|
Oaks
|
8.4
|
Bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa
|
11.5
|
Bur oak
|
4.1
|
N/A
|
Prairies
|
Other angiosperms
|
84.4
|
Eastern cottonwood,Populus deltoides
|
62.0
|
Green ash
|
50.9
|
0.4571
|
No comments:
Post a Comment